JCI, SKS için bir dizi standart ve gösterge önerisive HIMSS-EMRAM kalite değerlendirme modelleri


Cece S., Köse İ.

Digital Health, cilt.10, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Derleme
  • Cilt numarası: 10
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1177/20552076241258455
  • Dergi Adı: Digital Health
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: accreditation, Health quality, medical informatics, postmodernism
  • İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: The Joint Commission International (JCI) and the Health Information Management System Society (HIMSS) are global accreditation groups for healthcare. JCI focuses on overall care quality, while HIMSS-Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM) looks at digital processes. Meanwhile, the Health Quality Standards (SKS) is Turkey's own system. It aligns with JCI and evaluates healthcare similarly. When a health institution wants to be accredited with one of these models, similar scope, process and criteria are repeatedly reviewed from different perspectives. However, it is not known whether the scope, process and criteria included in these models are related to the postmodern management approach (PMMA), which is one of today's business approaches. It is observed that today's businesses are dominated by PMMAs. Similarly, healthcare organizations are also influenced by PMMAs since they are qualified as businesses. Yöntemler: This study investigated the compatibility of the concepts, processes and criteria covered by SKS, JCI and HIMSS-EMRAM models with PMMAs. Using the Delphi technique, PMMAs were explained to subject-matter experts (SMEs) in the form of written texts delivered. SMEs evaluated whether the standards/criteria are compatible with PMMAs. During this evaluation, they examined whether the standard/criteria included in the relevant model are directly or indirectly indicative of these approaches. SMEs developed their standards/criteria for the approaches which no standards/criteria could be matched with. The binary pairwise comparison method was used to determine the weighted value of the proposed standards/criteria. Sonuçlar: SMEs proposed a total of 24 standards and 18 indicators for nine postmodern organizational management approaches. Conclusion: The literature presented a proposal for new standards and indicators. They would be unique. They would address how well these three models fit the PMMA.